Court: Government Doesn’t Have to Pay Reparations for Slaughtering Native American Tribe

lrnative

Emma Gannon | Courthouse News Service

DENVER (CN) – The U.S. government has immunity from Native Americans seeking the reparations promised after the Army slaughtered their ancestors in 1864, the 10th Circuit ruled.

Homer Flute and three others brought the federal class action at issue two years ago, seeking an accounting or reparation funds held in trust for their ancestors for the last century and a half since the Sand Creek Massacre in Colorado.

The ruling gives a thorough description of the “ignominious” chapter of U.S. history, saying the United States was in the process of yet another relocation of the Arapaho and Cheyenne tribes on the day of the attack in fall 1864.




Though the tribes had been promised peaceful habitation of a tract of land by the Arkansas River called the Sandy Fork in 1861, officials conspired to move them to Fort Lyon in 1864.

After disarming the tribes of everything but some rudimentary hunting weapons, the Army gave them permission to make camp at Sandy Creek and hunt bison.

At sunrise on Nov. 29, 700 U.S. troops marched on the tribes’ camp, where the Indians were flying both an American flag and white flag of truce. They hunted down those who fled, killed them, and mutilated their bodies. Most of those who died were women and children, but an exact number remains unknown.

There are an estimated 15,000 descendants of the 70 to 163 people killed that morning.

Though the government laid out reparations for the deadly attack in the 1866 Treaty of Little Arkansas, the descendants say those funds were paid directly to the tribes instead of specific, affected individuals.

Some of the money was also allegedly returned as a surplus in 1872.

Though the class contends that the reparations were “insufficient to compensate all the victims of the massacre,” a federal judge dismissed the lawsuit for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

A three-person panel of the 10th Circuit affirmed on Oct. 22

“Plaintiffs argue that the treaty, in combination with the appropriation of funds, created an enforceable trust relationship such that they are now entitled to an accounting from the secretary,” Judge Carolyn McHugh wrote for the court, referring to the head of the U.S. Department of Interior. “But neither the treaty nor the 1866 Appropriations Act contains any express trust language. At best, plaintiffs point to language appropriating a sum of money for the secretary’s use in paying reparations to specific individuals according to the secretary’s assessment of that individual’s ‘wants and conditions.’ This language represents only an obligation to make a onetime payment to specific individuals who were directly injured by the loss of family members or property during the massacre.” (Emphasis in original.)




Though the decision was unanimous, Judge Gregory Phillips wrote in a concurring opinion that the descendants did demonstrate a trust relationship between the tribes and the United States.

“The existence of fiduciary obligations and the presence of common-law trust elements can suffice to create an enforceable trust,” Phillips wrote. “Here, the relationship between the United States and the Tribes established by the treaty and the 1866 Appropriations Act has ‘all of the necessary elements of a common law trust.'”

Nevertheless, the court got it write in finding that the United States has not waived its sovereign immunity, rendering it immune to legal penalty, Phillips said.

The land on which the battle took place has since been designated the Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site by the National Park Service.



You might also like

Bay Area Man Gets a Tattoo of Hillary Clinton Days Before the Election Result

He said “Instead of talking about her winning, I wanted to do something to prove it, to put my money where my mouth is.” Ron Morrison then paid money to

Are Clinton Insiders Involved in Child Abduction? A Factual Analysis

A conspiracy theory has been promulgated according to which John and Tony Podesta were involved in the abduction of Madeleine McCann. In what follows we will examine the relevant details and provide our

UK Official Makes Stunning Announcement: “I Met With Source of Leaks, It’s Not Russia”

December 11, 2016 | WASHINGTON, DC “It’s bullshit.” Those are the words Craig Murray used to describe the current state of mainstream media. He is referring to the media’s wild

BREAKING: Wikileaks Reveals Obama’s Personal Email Address

Alarming news has surfaced according to which Wikileaks has disclosed Obama’s personal email address to the world. CNN reported that the leaked emails from Wikileaks have furnished Barack Obama’s personal

Veterans Apologize To Indigenous On Behalf Of U.S. Army At Standing Rock [Video]

Amanda Froelich | True Activist Hundreds of veterans from across the United States took a knee and begged for forgiveness for crimes committed toward indigenous people in the name of

Live Animals are Being Sold as ‘Trinkets’ in Tiny Plastic Keychains

  Every year, 10 million animals are killed in China. This new fad, however, takes animal cruelty to another level. Lipika Mudgal | True Activist There have been many examples

In Just Under 4 Minutes, CBS News Anchor Explains How and Why the US Created ISIS

Mike Sawyer | The Free Thought Project As Americans cower in fear over the perceived threat from men, women and children attempting to escape from war-torn Syria, the majority of

French Voters Call On Obama To Run For President To “Give French People Hope”

Tyler Durden | Zero Hedge As French voters look set to make a massive swing to the right in their upcoming presidential election (see our notes on the topic here

Border Patrol Finds Drug Catapult Attached To U.S.-Mexico Border Wall

Josie Wales/ANTIMEDIA  Phoenix, AZ — While patrolling in Arizona last week, U.S. Border Patrol agents located a catapult near the Douglas Port of entry area that was being used to hurl

  • CLO

    TIME TO PAY UP MOTHRFKERS OR ELSE!!!!

  • Shirley Willis

    So many things sicken me about this country…..I am sickened….

  • Stephen Bennett

    So, is the very same tribe willing to then pay reparations for the peoples before them that they slaughtered, other natives that they totally wiped out? Where would this end? The peoples of the world have been fighting and wiping out tribes and entire nations since the beginning of humans. I’m hoping it’s over, but in any case it is too convoluted to make reparations for ancient history. We need to look forward and be better humans.